A literature review of recent studies,
papers, books, journals, and government data pertinent to violence and
crime in urban schools was conducted by the Independent Projects Trust
at the request of the national Secretariat for Safety and Security.
The purpose of the project was to review
literature in order to determine what projects and programmes, or interventions,
are currently being undertaken in urban schools in order to assess their
impact on the problem and to analyse the key success factors, lessons
and challenges.
This review was further required in
order to determine measurement criteria on which to review future interventions,
and to provide a framework for further social crime prevention initiatives.
The review addresses seven major
themes and these were :
- What is meant by a ‘culture of violence'?
Owing to a number of historical factors, many South Africa children
were born, reared, have matured, married and died in violent situations.
Some have become so immune to violent actions that they see violence
as both an acceptable way of expression, and as a way of channelling
their emotions. Schools located in disadvantaged areas where the
culture of violence reigns are plagued with violence, crimes, gangs,
drugs, contraband, and other related problems.
-
What are the ‘risk factors' for youth who
become violent? The key risk factors identified within
the literature, and with no particular ranking, are being poor,
race, age, location i.e. where you live, sex and gender, having been
victimised, coming from a dysfunctional family, doing poorly at
school and abusing a substance. These risk factors do not themselves
cause criminality but rather, over time, influence the likelihood
of criminal behaviour. The greater the number of risk factors, the
greater the likelihood of turning to crime and violence.
-
What are the ‘resilience factors which underlie
a child with the so called ‘risk factors' to NOT become violent
or a perpetrator of crime? Characteristics of the resilient
child such as high self esteem, trust, self-reliance, assertiveness,
compassion, or the ability to conceptualise and problem-solve often
come from very early childhood experiences. It is an uphill battle
to try to gain these if the first five years of life inculcate the
opposite.
-
Is there an alternative to the ‘risk ' /
‘resilience' factor approach? The alternative approach
is to understand that violent school-age children are a product
of a society that is economically, socially, politically, emotionally,
and physically violent. Townships and informal settlements represent
the spaces of the most traumatised, victimised and brutalised of
South African people. The alternative is to recognise this and make
every effort to upgrade these socially-devastating environments.
-
What is the impact of violence in schools?
Gang turf wars spill onto school grounds because the school itself
is a territorial prize for selling drugs, collecting revenue from
theft, and recruiting gang members or intimidating children into
becoming surrogate criminals. Based on school violence studies by
the IPT since 1997, the situation is so destabilised in some areas
that both children and staff members enter and leave campus as they
wish and classes are not conducted according to any regular schedule.
-
Has research been undertaken to examine
the ‘school system' as a producer of violence? The Government,
The National Youth Commission, and the National Crime Prevention
Strategy, have all recognised that there is the need to implement
a curricula that is relevant to the life of South African youth.
Thus, rather than look further into the failings of the school system,
we need to implement the existing policies and strategies by identifying
material which stimulates our youth and testing the kinds of techniques
which work to effect democratic school management.
-
What are the windows of intervention for
each important risk factor? Risk factors are so enmeshed
with each other that it becomes almost impossible to have any marked
impact by dealing with one in isolation from the others. The risk
factor which does seem to underpin all others is the high level
of poverty and the lack of opportunity to for escape from this dreadful
cycle. This interdependence of all risk factors highlights the need
to co ordinate intervention efforts in order to ameliorate the benefits.
Nevertheless, this does not mean that individual efforts have no
value or should not continue but, rather where interventions are
occurring, that they should be supported by the State and that future
interventions should build on existing efforts rather than replicate
work already done.
Gaps in Research and Review-based
Recommendations
While there are several areas in which
additional research might be conducted, there is so much sound research
and policy that has not been implemented that research and further workshopping
of ideas can be counter-productive if we do not act on and test out
the ideas and policies already in hand.
This means that:
the principle
area for further research is to audit and then monitor all existing
programmes to combat youth violence in urban schools for success factors
and best practices rather than originate new avenues for research
schools must be encouraged
to cooperate with existing government frameworks, policies and legislation
for combating crime
schools must also ally themselves with community-based
efforts to combat crime including active participation in the Community
Police Forum and forming partnerships with NGOs, local community organisations,
and government agencies.
This line of reasoning can be established
if we review, in short answers, what this literature review has established
according to the initial questions posed in the terms of reference.
General Recommendations,
Comments and Caveats
An audit and evaluation of crime interventions
and current crime prevention programmes is needed if we are to:
determine, with any degree
of certainty, which models are effective in reducing crime coordinate
existing efforts within the schools
The literature is nearly unanimous in
recommending the implementation of broad based interventions, involving
schools, families, communities and other support agencies. The need
for this approach becomes fairly obvious when one understands the complex
and interrelated set of factors that produce juvenile offenders.
The most important recommendations
are :
- the principle area for further research is to
audit and then monitor all existing programmes to combat youth violence
in urban schools for ‘success factors and best practices' rather
than originate new avenues for research
-
schools must establish security committees under
the auspices of school governing bodies and be encouraged to cooperate
with existing government frameworks, policies and legislation for
combating crime
-
schools must also ally themselves with community-based
efforts to combat crime including active participation in the Community
Police Forum and forming partnerships with NGOs, local community
organisations, and government agencies.
This means our focus should turn
away from staring at the problem and toward finding ways to implement
some solutions. To generate the most effective policy possible it will
be necessary to rectify one problem uncovered in the literature, the
failure to objectively evaluate existing programmes. It will be necessary
to examine interventions at the family, school, and community level
and discover the success factors and best practices. These would then
need to be coordinated into a national policy framework.
For the complete literature review in
Adobe Acrobat PDF format click here.
For further information regarding
our work around youth violence please contact one of our staff
click
here.